St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Overton
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above).
Appellant insists that the stipulation in the bill of lading requiring appellee within four months after the tomatoes were delivered in Chicago to make claim in writing to it or to the delivering carrier for the loss he sustained was just and reasonable, and therefore valid; that it conclusively appeared that appellee did not comply with the stipulation; and it further insists that the trial court therefore erred when he refused to give its requested special charge instructing the jury to find in its favor. Appellee, on the other hand, insists that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Express Co. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Cau v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Queen of the PacificSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Clegg v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schaff v. Ike Exstein Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. McNattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Hossley v. Roadway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
- Dew v. American Rio Grande Land & Irrigation Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929