Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hazard Powder Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 15, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On motion for a rule upon the plaintiff in error to file a new supersedeas bond.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chief Justice

Waite delivered the opinion of the court.

We held in Jerome v. McCarter, 21 Wall. 17, after much consideration, that if, “after the security has been accepted, the circumstances of the case, or of the parties, or of the sureties upon the bond, have changed, so that security which, at the time it was taken, was good and sufficient, does not continue to be so, we might, upon a proper application, so adjudge and order as justice might require. But upon facts existing at the time the security was accepted, the action of the justice, within the statute and the rules of practice…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jerome v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Reilly v. EdringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Crown Cork & Seal Co. v. Standard Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  3. Craig v. Ingham Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API