Legal Opinion

Conti v. Bank of America

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided March 28, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00182Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF HAWAII VINCENT CONTI, CIV. NO. 24-00182 LEK-KJM Plaintiff, vs. BANK OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT [DOC. 1-1] FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6) On July 19, 2024, Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“Defendant”) filed their Motion to Dismiss Complaint [Doc. 1-1] for Failure to State a Claim Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) (“Motion”). [Dkt. no. 13.] Pro se Plaintiff Vincent Conti (“Plaintiff”) did not file a response to the Motion. The Court finds…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Webster Salasker Lucas v. Department of Corrections California Men's Colony-WestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API