Legal Opinion

Bear Lake Watch, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 2003No. 02-70660Published

1Opinion of the Court

324 F.3d 1071

BEAR LAKE WATCH, INC., Petitioner,

v.

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent,

PACIFICORP; The States of Idaho, Utah And Wyoming; Bear River Water Users Association, Respondents-Intervenors.

No. 02-70660.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 5, 2003.

Filed March 27, 2003.

Randall M. Weiner, Boulder, CO, for the petitioner.

Lona T. Perry, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C., for the respondent.

Thomas H. Nelson, Jeffrey S. Lovinger (argued), Thomas H. Nelson & Associates, Portland, OR, for the intervenor-respondent PacifiCorp.

H…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  5. In Re Fred Lowenschuss, Debtor. Resorts International, Inc. v. Fred LowenschussCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API