Legal Opinion

Merling, Marx, & Seidman, Inc. v. Dynamic Classics, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 11,1973, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the plaintiff-respondent’s motion for partial summary judgment denied. Appellant shall recover of respondent $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. In an endeavor to compromise plaintiff-respondent’s claim for work, labor, services and materials furnished, defendant’s attorney wrote a letter to his adversary offering a certain amount in full settlement. Special Term granted partial summary judgment in this amount. The letter is incapable of construction as an admission of liability but…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Firedoor Corp. of America v. Reliance Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  2. Case Press, Inc. v. Kennai Drilling LimitedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API