Legal Opinion

Claim of Senecal v. Allied Bendix

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 25, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Crew III, J.P.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 7, 2004, which ruled that claimant did not sustain a causally related consequential injury and denied his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.

Claimant sustained a work-related injury to his left shoulder in 1991 and received workers’ compensation benefits. Claimant underwent surgery on this shoulder in 1992 and retired from his employment in 1995. In January 2002, claimant sought treatment for pain he purportedly was experiencing in his right shoulder, contending that he had sustained a consequential…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Claim of Johnson v. OCM BocesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Claim of Jones v. New York State Department of CorrectionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Matter of Stange v. Angelica Textile Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Claim of Atkinson v. Joseph Baldwin ConstructionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Matter of Levin v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API