Legal Opinion
Marshall v. City of Lubbock
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 29, 1969No. 7971PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENTON, Chief Justice.
This suit was brought by James G. Marshall as a taxpayer, and in behalf of all property owners, against the City of Lubbock and the Lubbock Industrial Foundation, to have a lease and sales option contract between the city and the foundation declared null and void. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the action on the ground that plaintiff had no justiciable interest which would justify his prosecution of the suit.
The City of Lubbock was the owner in fee simple, except for certain mineral reservations, of the three contiguous…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Osborne v. KeithTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- City of San Antonio v. StrumbergTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Scott v. Board of AdjustmentTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- San Antonio Conservation Soc. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
- Swinford v. Allied Finance Company of Casa ViewCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Marshall v. City of LubbockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Kordus v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Scott v. Harris Methodist HEBCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Alexander v. City of GreenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979