Legal Opinion

Barnard v. Pennsylvania Range Boiler Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 30, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 31887Published

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

Once again,1 we are asked to rule upon the defendants’ motion to> dismiss the plaintiff’s amended complaint on the ground that it does not state a claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) (6).

This is an action for damages arising out of injuries resulting in the death of the plaintiff’s decedent in Massachusetts when a water heater exploded in her cel*561lar. One of the theories of relief is that the defendant manufacturers were guilty of various breaches of express and implied warranties with reference to the water heater. As between the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  2. Sullivan v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  3. Barnard v. Pennsylvania Range Boiler Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API