Legal Opinion

Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 5, 1915No. 4348PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from District Gowk Pontotoc County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by W. E. Miller against the Missouri, Oklahoma & Q-ulf Bailway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant ■brings error. .

1Opinion of the CourtRiddle, J.

Tbe parties will be referred to here as they were in the trial court. Plaintiff alleges substantially that he was employed by defendant as storekeeper in the city of Muskogee; that it was his duty to collect, take charge of, and distribute the supplies used by defendant on its train, and to go from the storeroom to the depot and receipt for all supplies; that, as part of his contract of employment, defendant was to furnish plaintiff with transportation for himself and supplies from the storeroom to the depot, a distance of about three-quarters of a mile; that defendant operated á passenger…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. City Council of Montgomery v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Block v. Milwaukee Street Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Davis v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BrazzellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Norman v. Scrivner-Stevens Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  4. Great Western Coal & Coke Co. v. SerbantasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API