Legal Opinion

Caduff v. Universal Underwriters Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 28, 1986No. C8-85-1223PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

This appeal is from a declaratory judgment determining Universal Underwriters’ attempt to cancel Francis Caduff’s motorcycle liability policy was ineffective and reforming the policy to include PIP benefits. We affirm.

FACTS

On March 15, 1982, respondent Francis Caduff applied for a motorcycle insurance policy with appellant Universal Underwriters in response to an offer received through the mail. The solicitation offered three separate insurance plans. Caduff chose plan “C”, the most comprehensive of the plans, which included liability, collision, and fire and theft…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Tollefson v. American Family Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Cormican v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  4. Lievers v. National Insurance UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Dairyland Insurance Co. v. NeumanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Green Mountain Insurance v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  2. Cooney v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Pierce v. MSI Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API