Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central Illinois Public Service Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 23, 1981No. 80-2006Published

1DissentPell, Circuit Judge

The majority opinion results, not in upholding reasonable compensation to ConRail for demurrage for the detention of its cars, but instead results in the imposition of a substantial penalty even though unfavorable weather, creating conditions beyond the control of CIPS, prevented the unloading of the cars. I think the result reached is not legally correct on the facts of this case and I therefore respectfully dissent.

Initially, I note that it is virtually horn-book law that the right to a penalty must be clear under the law in order to exact a penalty in a civil case, Anuchick v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marion C'de Baca v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  2. World Insurance Company of Omaha, Nebraska v. Mrs. Zelma PipesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  3. Anuchick v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1942
  4. General Ice Cream Corp. v. BensonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API