Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. Kidwell

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1904PublishedCited by 6 opinions

MOTION EOR REHEARING.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PERRY, J.

(Galbraith, J., dissenting.)

For a statement of tbe case on appeal-see ante, p. 351. Tbe complainant now moves for a rebearing on tbe following grounds: (1) that said decision of tbe Supreme Court is in conflict witb former controlling decisions to wbicb tbe attention *527•of said Court was not drawn; (2) that questions decisive of the case, and duly submitted by counsel, bave been overlooked by the court in said decision; (3) that said decision is based upon mistake or misapprehension of the facts of the case apparent •upon the record; (4) that many fraudulent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Assessment of Taxes on the Following Sugar PlantationsHawaii Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cha Fook v. Lau PiuHawaii Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Christian Ex Rel. Von Holt v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. Kahua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Deponte v. Ulupalakua Ranch, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Soares v. FreitasHawaii Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Honolulu Iron Works Co. v. BigelowHawaii Supreme Court · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API