Legal Opinion

Ameyapoh v. Frosh

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided September 13, 2021No. 1:19-cv-00017Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND © KOFFI AMEYAPOH, * Petitioner, * v. * Civil Action No. JKB-19-0017 WARDEN BRIAN FROSH, * Respondent. * tek MEMORANDUM OPINION . Petitioner Koffi Ameyapoh has filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus challenging his conviction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. Ameyapoh states as his ground for relief that the Maryland Court of Special Appeals’ dismissal of his appeal violated his right to Equal Protection Clause and his “Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment right to a meaningful appeal,” ECF No. 1 at 5, 7. Respondent Warden…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Rose v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
  5. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API