M'Vay v. Bloodgood
Supreme Court of Alabama
Error to Mobile Circuit court. Assumpsit, for money had and received — tried.by Harris, J.
1Opinion of the CourtOrmond, J.
This was a case agreed. The material facts are, that one George W. Sinclair, being indebted to one Thomas R. Bolling, in the sum of eight thousand dollars, executed four several promissory notes, for two thousand dollars each, payable at three; six, nine and twelve months after date; and to secure their payment, conveyed to Abner S. Lipscomb, certain personal property, in trust, to secure to Bolling the payment of the said promissory notes.
The first of said notes was paid: the second note was by Bolling endorsed to one Fearn, for a valuable consideration, who endorsed it to the defendant in…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Grattan v. WigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Cullum v. ErwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
- Fox v. FoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999