Legal Opinion
Stipo v. Carpenito
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*865In a prior order dated December 7, 2010, the Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the complaint after rejecting, as “insufficient to defeat [the] plaintiffs motion,” the “conclusory allegations” that the defendant had asserted in opposition. A money judgment dated January 18, 2011, in the principal sum of $40,000, was thereafter entered. The defendant then made the postjudgment motion now under review in which, relying on documents that predated the judgment, he sought to have the judgment vacated pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (2).
We agree with the Supreme Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Committee for Weizmann Institute of Science v. DunnNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Ferdico v. ZweigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Cizler v. CizlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wall Street Mortgage Bankers, Ltd. v. RodgersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Washington Mutual Bank v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Matter of Franco Belli Plumbing & Heating & Sons, Inc. v. New York City School Constr. Auth.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Yellow Book of New York, L.P. v. CataldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Yellow Book of New York, L.P. v. CataldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013