Legal Opinion

Clinch v. Spence

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 26, 2002No. 01 CIV. 3202(CM)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM, DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McMAHON, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael Clinch (“Clinch”) brings this action alleging deprivation of his rights guaranteed to him by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages against all Defendants and punitive damages against Defendants Thomas Spence (“Spence”), Robert Clearwater (“Clearwater”), Robert Kampf (‘‘Kampf’), Barbara Sause (“Sause”) and James Stuart (“Stuart”); Clinch claims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Rhulen Agency, Inc. v. Alabama Insurance Guaranty Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dolan v. RothDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API