Legal Opinion

Boday v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1985No. Nos. 84-1767, 84-1837 and 84-3735PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:

Milo and Nance Boday, Ann Cleary, and Mark and Virginia Clements (taxpayers) appeal separately the district courts’ summary judgments in favor of the United States in their tax refund actions. They each contend that the district courts erred *1474in finding that: (1) the IRS properly assessed $500 frivolous return penalties against them; (2) the fifth amendment does not apply to their claims; (3) they are not entitled to a hearing before imposition of the section 6702 penalty; and (4) they lack standing to challenge the constitutionality of I.R.C. § 6702. The Bodays and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Western Reserve Oil & Gas Co. v. NewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  2. Donna L. Todd v. United States of America and R.S. Wintrode, Jr., District Director, Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  3. Daniel R. Hudson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Allen W. Jolly v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Martin S. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API