Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Rubin
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided January 21, 1957No. Record 4596PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.
The controlling question presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in modifying an order entered on October 26, 1955, by C. H. Lamb, Commissioner of the Division of Motor Vehicles, under authority of §46-420, Virginia Code, 1950, which suspended for thirty days the operator’s license of Jack Rubin.
The pertinent provisions of § 46-420 follow:
“The Commissioner may, after hearing * * * suspend or revoke for not more than one year * * * the operator’s or chauffeur’s license issued to any person * * * whenever it is satisfactorily proved * * * that the licensee under charges:
“(4) Is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Butler v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Ladd v. LambSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Tate v. LambSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Lamb v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1954
- Willis v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Danner v. HassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
- Ward v. Oregon State Board of NursingOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Lamb v. ClarkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
- Commonwealth v. BrownSussex County Circuit Court · 1990
- Kootner v. Commissioner, Division of Motor VehiclesNorfolk Chancery Court, Virginia · 1968