Legal Opinion

Foote v. Lorain & Cleveland Railway Co.

Ohio Circuit Courts

Decided February 11, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Heard on Error.

1Opinion of the CourtCaedweee, J.

The plaintiff in error brought this action to compel the defendant in error to appropriate certain property belonging to her, situated in Cuyahoga county and lying along its right of way between Cleveland and Lorain.

The defendant in error undertook to make a contract of purchase of this property from the brother of the plaintiff in error; and the property being owned by the plaintiff in error and her brother in common, each owning a half interest, she, not being a party to the contract, is not bound by the same.

*687The defendant in error supposed that it had purchased the entire right to this…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Devou v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API