Legal Opinion

In re Allen

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Habeas Gobpus proceedings.

1Opinion of the Court

Andrews, G. P., J.

This is a habeas corpus to inquire into the cause of the detention of the relator, George Allen. The return to the writ issued in this case is a commitment by a city magistrate which recites that the relator has been held to answer to the Court of Special Sessions, in this city, upon a charge of violating section 277 of the Penal Code, in that he permitted dancing and *699did dance on Sunday, April 22, 1901, at premises known as Ro. 162 East Fifty-fifth street, city of Rew York, borough of Manhattan, such dancing consisting of waltzes and two-steps, not as an exhibition, on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mayor, Etc. v. . Eden Musee American Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MartinNew York Court of Special Session · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API