Legal Opinion

Postlethwaite & Netterville, APAC v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 2003No. Nos. 2003 CA 0063, 2002 CW 2162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPettigrew, J.

The instant suit involves various issues concerning professional liability coverage procured by plaintiff, Postlethwaite and Netterville, APAC (“P & N”), from defendant, Royal Indemnity Company (“Royal”). Following a hearing on cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court rendered partial summary judgment in favor of P & N, finding that P & N had timely *592exercised its rights to an extended reporting period endorsement and that Royal was obligated to provide P & N with a defense in connection with malpractice claims made against P & N in a separate proceeding. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Allen v. EXHIBITION HALL AUTHORITYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  2. Johnson v. Evan Hall Sugar Co-Op., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Foreman v. DANOS AND CUROLE MARINE CONT.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Thomas v. Fina Oil and Chemical Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Dennis v. Finish Line, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rutter v. JanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API