Legal Opinion

Hazzard v. Heneveld

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1933No. Docket No. 42, Calendar No. 37,058PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff recovered damages against defendant arising from an automobile collision, and defendant bas appealed. Tbe case was tried before the court without a jury, and appellant complains that the trial court was in error in holding that the driver of the automobile in which plaintiff was riding at the time of the accident was not guilty of contributory negligence, and also in holding that the defendant was guilty of negligence which was the proximate cause of the accident and plaintiff’s damages. In an opinion filed by the trial judge the facts and issues are so clearly presented that we…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. McEachronMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Marciniak v. SundeenMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Potter v. Felician Sisters Home for OrphansMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Layton v. Cregan & Mallory Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API