Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Ries (In Re Carpenter)

United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 13, 2009No. BAP 08-6046PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.

Debtor Todd Carpenter appeals from the Bankruptcy Court’s Order finding that a prepetition lump sum payment for retroactive social security benefits was property of Carpenter’s estate and, further, that Carpenter could not claim an exemption in those funds pursuant to § 522(d)(10)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code. 1 In so holding, the Bankruptcy Court concluded that, because Carpenter elected to claim federal exemptions under § 522(d), the provisions .of § 407 of the Social Security Act 2 did not apply to protect the funds from Carpen ter’s creditors. Because we conclude…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Philpott v. Essex County Welfare BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Rousey v. JacowaySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. In the Matter of Roger Burnett Treadwell, Debtor. James D. Walker, Jr., Trustee v. Roger Burnett Treadwell, and Regina TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  4. Martin v. Bucher (In Re Martin)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. Ries (In Re Carpenter)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. In re FranklinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2014
  3. Meyer v. Scholz (In Re Scholz)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Smith v. Missouri (In re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  5. In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API