Legal Opinion
Mathias v. Jacobs
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 2002No. 99 Civ.2004PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
By its decision rendered on September 27, 2001 (the “2001 Decision”) 1 ruling on a motion for summary judgment, the Court determined that plaintiff Michael Mathias (“Mathias”) was entitled to recover damages from defendant Bradley Jacobs (“Jacobs”) for breach of a 1992 stock option agreement (the “Option Agreement” or “1992 Option Agreement”) that contained a so-called “non-contact” promise the Court held unenforceable. The Court then directed the parties to propose a basis for computing any damages that Mathias may be entitled to recover…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Sofi Classic S.A. de C.V. v. HurowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- OBG Technical Services, Inc. v. Northrop Grumman Space & Mission Systems Corp. Ex Rel. TRW, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Pierce County v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Finger Lakes Bottling Co., Inc. v. Coors Brewing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Aristocrat Leisure Ltd. v. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. AmericasDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.