Legal Opinion

Thackery v. Helfrich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1931No. 22354PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The parties will be referred to in the relation they stood in the trial court. Plaintiff, Roy Thackery, an infant, sustained a fracture of a bone of his leg. He employed the defendant, Mart L. Helfrich, a physician, to reduce the fracture and to treat him during the time and process of the healing of such fracture. The leg when healed was crooked and shortened. He brought suit against the physician in malpractice.

The evidence tended to show that immediately after the defendant had reduced the fracture he was informed by another physician present that the two ends of the broken bone had…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Minnesota v. National Tea Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Renfroe v. Eli Lilly & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. Ford Motor Company v. Wallace H. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API