Legal Opinion
Bessie Roth v. Sammy Davis, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 5, 1956No. 14713_1PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.
The title to this action for personal injuries originally read as follows:
“Bessie Roth,
Plaintiff,
vs.
“Will Mastín Trio, Sammy Davis, Jr., Sammy Davis, Will Mastín, Doe I-X,
Defendants.”
The allegations relating to defendants read:
“I. Defendants are citizens and residents of the State of California; plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the State of Ohio.
“II. This is an action and controversy between citizens of different states involving an amount in excess of $3,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs.
“HI. The true names or capacities, whether individual,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wormley v. WormleySupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wilson v. Oswego TownshipSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Federal Reserve Bank v. Omaha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fifty Associates, a Massachusetts Corporation v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Billie J. Preaseau v. The Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Ellen Molnar v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Glen Earl Grigg v. Southern Pacific Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.