Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Davet v. Sutula

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 2012No. 2011-1506PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment denying the application of appellant, Richard F. Davet, for reconsideration of the dismissal of his complaint for a writ of prohibition to prevent appellee, Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas Judge Kathleen Ann Sutula, from issuing any further orders in a foreclosure action and for a writ of mandamus to compel Judge Sutula to vacate all orders, entries, and other process issued in the case. Davet’s motion was “a nullity because his [prohibition] action was filed originally in the court of appeals, rendering App.R. 26(A) inapplicable.” See State ex rel.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Mason v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Washington v. CrushOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State ex rel. Davet v. SutulaOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. AgeeOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. State v. RiceOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. Miller v. MellotOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Wood v. McClellandOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Abraitis v. GallagherOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API