Legal Opinion
Richmond v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1956No. 20650PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
85 So.2d 717 (1956)
Pearly RICHMOND
v.
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY COMPANY.
No. 20650.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Orleans.
March 5, 1956.
Frank S. Bruno, New Orleans, for plaintiff and appellant.
Henriques & Mayo, New Orleans, for defendant and appellee.
McBRIDE, Judge.
This is a suit for compensation filed by Pearly Richmond against New Amsterdam Casualty Company which is the compensation liability insurer of the employer. Richmond claims that as the result of an accident on February 11, 1954, while in the course and scope of his employment with Gervais F. Favrot Co., Inc., he was rendered totally and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Henderson v. New Amsterdam Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Roy v. GuillotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Price v. TL James & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1951
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. PeekLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
- Harris v. Argonaut Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hanford v. Jan C. Uiterwyk CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Morris v. Supreme Bedding & Furniture Mfg. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
- Cotton v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.