Legal Opinion
Sokolowski v. Swift and Company
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 18, 1968No. 3-68 Civ. 59 and 3-68 Civ. 58PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEVILLE, District Judge.
These cases are before the court not on the merits but on the motions of the defendants to dismiss the complaints of plaintiffs on the grounds that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter and that the complaints fail to state claims upon which relief may be granted. The plaintiffs are eighteen female employees of Swift and Company and have instituted these actions pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., alleging that the defendants have violated their rights to equal employment opportunities by discriminating against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Humphrey v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gussie MICKEL, Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA STATE EMPLOYMENT SERVICE and/or Exide Battery Service, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- James P. Miller v. International Paper CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Mary F. Cunningham v. Litton Industries, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Violet Davis Grubbs, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. Earl L. Butz, Individually and as Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Waters v. Wisconsin Steel Works of International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Held v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.