Legal Opinion
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Harnsberger
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided October 6, 2009No. 2:08-cv-00215PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE’S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 90); GRANTING UNITED STATES’S MOTION TO BE DISMISSED AS A THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT (DOC. NO. 93); GRANTING STATE DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 96); AND GRANTING DEFENDANT HARNSBERGER’S RENEWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 100)
CLARENCE A. BRIMMER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on several motions to dismiss: (1) a Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss Eastern Shoshone Tribe (“EST”) as a Third-Party Defendant (Doc. No. 90); (2) a motion to dismiss the United States as a Third-Party Defendant (Doc.…
2Cases cited66 opinions
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Center for Biological Diversity v. PizarchikDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012