Legal Opinion
Barnhill v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided June 13, 1985No. 83-1399PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
471 So.2d 160 (1985)
Arthur BARNHILL, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 83-1399.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
June 13, 1985.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Christopher S. Quarles, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard B. Martell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
SHARP, Justice.
Barnhill argues on appeal that his convictions for attempted robbery[1] and aggravated battery with a deadly weapon[2] violate his constitutional double jeopardy rights[3] because the act which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Borges v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Bell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Baker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Collins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Gotthardt v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Foster v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Holloman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Sinclair v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994