Legal Opinion

State v. James

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 17, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

The defendants were indicted for an alleged violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 951, 1 the indictment charging:

“That on or about the 21st day of April, 1972, and continuously thereafter, in the City of Portland, County of Cumberland and State of Maine, the above named defendants JOSEPH FENTON and TIMOTHY JAMES did conspire and agree together to commit the crime of intent to extort by demanding from one John L. Dixon the sum of Four Hundred Dollars ($400), to be paid to the said defendants JOSEPH FENTON and TIMOTHY JAMES to prevent injury to the property of said John L. Dixon or his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MayberrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1859
  2. State v. RipleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850
  3. State v. ChickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  4. Berger v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. State v. HewettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1850

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HebertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. State v. HassapelisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API