Legal Opinion

Landahl v. North American Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 22, 1960No. 30045Published

1Per curiam

Noting potential jurisdiction we granted certiorari and have now heard the matter on the merits. Being of the view that the decision of the Court of Appeal, Second District, 113 So.2d 588, does not conflict with a prior decision of this Court on the same point of law the writ is discharged on authority of Ansin v. Thurston, Fla., 101 So.2d 808 and Florida Power & Light Co. v. Bell, Fla., 113 So.2d 697. Also see Commercial Credit Corporation v. Varn, Fla.App., 108 So.2d 638.

It is so ordered.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., and McCRARY, Circuit Judge,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ansin v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
  2. Commercial Credit Corporation v. VarnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. North American Co. v. LandahlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API