Legal Opinion
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cocuzza
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 20, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
91 N.J. Super. 60 (1966)
219 A.2d 190
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION, AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LORRAINE COCUZZA, AN INFANT, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, JAMES COCUZZA, JAMES COCUZZA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND CHARLES RYAN, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided April 20, 1966.
Mr. Daniel Oppenheim for plaintiff (Messrs. Oppenheim and Oppenheim, attorneys; Mr. Henry H. Rubenson on the brief).
Mr. Sidney C. Swirsky for defendants (Mr. Walter S. Swirsky on the brief).
MINTZ. J.S.C.
This is a declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. FlanaginSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. New Jersey Manufacturers (Casualty) InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Great American Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Pearson v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kish v. Motor Club of America Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. McHughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- John Tenopir v. State Farm Mutual Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Tickner v. Union Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.