Legal Opinion

Tennant v. Neal

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 24, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to the Circuit Court of Randolph county; the Hon. William H. Snyder, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Plaintiff in error brought assumpsit against Mary Ann Heal, the widow and administratrix, and Mary E. Hume and Martha Henson, the children and heirs of Thomas F. Heal, deceased. The real cause of action is a claim against the estate of Heal for §549.24 in favor of plaintiff, allowed by the county court, July 15, 1877, and the right to recover the amount of it against defendants in this suit is based upon the alleged facts that there were no personal assets of said estate to pay said claim, or any part of it, and defendants inherited, as heirs of Heal, real estate which they owned and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Branger v. LucyIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cutright v. StanfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Vanmeter's Heirs v. Love's HeirsIllinois Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Busey v. SmithU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API