Legal Opinion

Ecroyd v. Ecroyd

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided May 6, 1998No. 96-436PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

hSULLIVAN, Judge.

This community property partition is before us on remand from the supreme court. The facts are found in our prior opinion, Ecroyd v. Ecroyd, 96-436 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/9/96); 682 So.2d 788, in which we rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff, Leslie Valentino Ecroyd, ordering defendant, Hank Edmond Ecroyd, to pay his former spouse an equalizing sum of $33,469.34. On December 19, 1997, the supreme court granted Hank’s writ application, remanding the ease to this court with the following order:

Granted. The case is remanded to the court of appeal to reconsider in the light of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Juneau v. LabordeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Wochomurka v. WochomurkaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Nichols v. NicholsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Ecroyd v. EcroydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  5. Ecroyd v. EcroydSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hall v. Brookshire Bros., Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API