Weber's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 32, Jan. T., 1918, by Hattie M. Weber, and Mary A. Weber, from decree of O. C. Berks Co., Sept. T., 1911, No. 24, dismissing petition for a citation in Estate of Anna Weber, Deceased. Petition for a citation to require an executor to account for profits of a decedent’s business conducted by him. Before Schaeffer, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court dismissed the petition. Hattie M Weber and Mary A. Weber appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 32, Jan. T., 1918, by Hattie M. Weber, and Mary A. Weber, from decree of O. C. Berks Co., Sept. T., 1911, No. 24, dismissing petition for a citation in Estate of Anna Weber, Deceased. Petition for a citation to require an executor to account for profits of a decedent’s business conducted by him. Before Schaeffer, P. J. The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts. The court dismissed the petition. Hattie M Weber and Mary A. Weber appealed. Error assigned was in dismissing the petition.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion bx
Mr. Justice Stewart,
Anna Weber, the testatrix, a widow, at the time of her death was the owner of a lot of ground in the City of Reading on which was erected a building in which she conducted on her own behalf two distinct enterprises, one the manufacture of paper boxes, the other the manufacture of badges, she owning all the machinery employed in each. Inasmuch as the present controversy relates exclusively to the management, control and final disposition of this item of testatrix’s property, it can be understood only as we here produce so much of the will of testatrix as expresses…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Coyle v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1919
- Friedrichs v. FriedrichsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930