McConkey v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, District Judge.
McConkey was convicted in the trial court for having violated the provisions of section 5440, Rev. St. U. S. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3676), in conspiring to commit the offense *830denounced by section 5480,. Rev. St. U. S., as amended by Act March 3, 1889, c. 393,, § 1, 35 Stat. 873 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696). To reverse the judgment of conviction he has sued out a writ of error from this court, and assigns as the only ground for’reversal that the indictment against him and others does not state facts sufficient to constitute a public offense against the laws of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Crawford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
- Ader v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- United States v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.