Legal Opinion

Halbach v. Boyman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 3, 2005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

WEFING, P.J.A.D.

We granted defendants Christopher Boyman and Boyman & Associates, P.C. (“Boyman”) leave to appeal from a trial court order directing Boyman to answer certain questions posed in his deposition and rejecting his contention that the questions improperly sought material protected under the work product doctrine enunciated in R. 4:10-2(c). Having reviewed the record in light of the contentions advanced on appeal, we reverse.

This is the second time we have been called upon to rule on discovery disputes in this matter. In Halbach v. Boyman,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. National Student Marketing Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  3. Otto v. Box U.S.A. Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1997
  4. Halbach v. BoymanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Twin Willows, LLC v. Lewis Pritzkur, Trustee for Patricia E. Gibbs, Dawn R. Ellery, Gwen D. Rinaldi, Patricia E. Gibbs, and Robin SilvermanCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API