City of Everett v. International Brotherhood of Police Officers
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
Based upon his interpretation of the collective bargaining agreement between the city and the police unions, the arbitrator found that the city had violated the parties’ agreement by deducting ten percent of the cost of premiums for health maintenance organization (HMO) insurance from the pay of those officers insured under such plans and ordered the city to reimburse the officers for the deductions made during the fiscal year in dispute, 1991. A Superior Court judge determined that any error in the arbitrator’s decision was beyond the scope of judicial review and dismissed the city’s motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Muschany v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Plymouth-Carver Regional School District v. J. Farmer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- City of Lawrence v. FalzaranoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Trustees of Boston & Maine Corp. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Middleborough Gas & Electric Department v. Town of MiddleboroughMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Boston Teachers Union, Local 66 v. City of Boston School CommitteeMassachusetts Superior Court · 2007