Sempf v. Ruhlman
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
RYDER, Judge.
Edmund Sempf appeals the final judgment denying his claims for foreclosure of a mortgage and cancellation of a satisfaction of mortgage. We reverse.
The undisputed findings of the court below include the following facts. Edmund Sempf sold real estate to his son, Helmut Sempf, in 1973 taking back a note and mortgage which is the subject of this action. Payments were due on a monthly basis, but no payments were made. Edmund Sempf began making demand on Hel-mut for payment within three months after the obligation accrued.
On March 7, 1977, Robert E. Ruhlman purchased the subject…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fielding v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- MI Co., Ltd. v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
- Sunrise Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. GiannettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- First Family Mortgage Corp. of Florida v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989