Legal Opinion

Sempf v. Ruhlman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 19, 1982No. 81-1412PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Judge.

Edmund Sempf appeals the final judgment denying his claims for foreclosure of a mortgage and cancellation of a satisfaction of mortgage. We reverse.

The undisputed findings of the court below include the following facts. Edmund Sempf sold real estate to his son, Helmut Sempf, in 1973 taking back a note and mortgage which is the subject of this action. Payments were due on a monthly basis, but no payments were made. Edmund Sempf began making demand on Hel-mut for payment within three months after the obligation accrued.

On March 7, 1977, Robert E. Ruhlman purchased the subject…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fielding v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1943

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MI Co., Ltd. v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Sunrise Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. GiannettiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. First Family Mortgage Corp. of Florida v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API