Legal Opinion

Pierce v. City of Phila.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-5539PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPappert, District Judge

This litigation arose from the City of Philadelphia's promotion of three employees-one Latina and two African-Americans-in the City's Department of Prisons ("PDP"). Plaintiff Deanna Pierce, a Native-American woman, claimed the City discriminated against her on the basis of race when it did not promote her, then retaliated against her because she complained of discrimination. A jury found the City did not discriminate against Pierce but did retaliate against her; it awarded nominal damages. Pierce filed three post-trial motions. One seeks judgment as a matter of law-or in the alternative, a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connecticut Judicial Branch v. GilbertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
  2. ACEVEDO v. CITY OF READINGDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. ALISON RAY v. AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  4. ARNOLD'S OFFICE FURNITURE v. BORDENDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Garcia-Colon v. Corporation of the State Insurance FundDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API