Legal Opinion

People v. Saraceno

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 6, 2003No. 1-00-0352PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reid

Following a jury trial, the defendant, Natale Saraceno, was found guilty of one count of residential burglary and as a result of his criminal background, he was sentenced as a Class X offender to serve 20 years’ imprisonment. The issues Saraceno raises on appeal are whether: (1) the trial court improperly stated Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, Criminal No. 3.15 (4th ed. 2000 (hereinafter IPI Criminal)) when it was submitted to the jury; (2) the trial court improperly restricted the testimony of witnesses; (3) the State made improper remarks during its closing argument; (4) the trial court…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. People v. KeeneIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. SlimIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. ReddickIllinois Supreme Court · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. CarreroAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. People v. CarreroAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
  5. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API