People v. Saraceno
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Reid
Following a jury trial, the defendant, Natale Saraceno, was found guilty of one count of residential burglary and as a result of his criminal background, he was sentenced as a Class X offender to serve 20 years’ imprisonment. The issues Saraceno raises on appeal are whether: (1) the trial court improperly stated Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions, Criminal No. 3.15 (4th ed. 2000 (hereinafter IPI Criminal)) when it was submitted to the jury; (2) the trial court improperly restricted the testimony of witnesses; (3) the State made improper remarks during its closing argument; (4) the trial court…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. KeeneIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. SlimIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. ReddickIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. CarreroAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- People v. CarreroAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
- People v. HamptonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2024
- People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.