Legal Opinion

Richmond Gentlemen, Inc. v. State of New York Liquor Authoity

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent New York State Liquor Authority, dated February 14, 1983, which, after a hearing, found petitioner guilty of certain charges, canceled its on-premises license and imposed a $1,000 bond claim.

Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

There is substantial evidence that petitioner suffered or permitted the licensed premises to become disorderly by suffering or permitting a lewd and indecent performance therein (Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, § 106, subd 6;…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. 92-07 Restaurant, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Salem Inn, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Highway Tavern Corp. v. McLaughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vanda Hodge Pub, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Cantina El Bukis Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Michael Frank of Jericho, Inc. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API