Legal Opinion

Mathis v. Nelson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1949No. 32568PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The first question to be decided here is whether or not the plaintiff has affirmatively alleged any act of negligence as the proximate cause of the collision referred to. In this regard, it is doubtful that the mere fact that a tractor and drag machine engaged in working the road is on the left-hand side thereof would be a violation of Code §§ 68-303 or 106-112 relating to motor vehicles passing on the right, as contended. It may often be necessary to work a road machine on the left side of the road, or even in such a position as to completely block the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickfaden v. Greencreek Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  2. City Council of Augusta v. OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Bach v. Bragg Bros. & Blackwell Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  4. Price v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  5. Doby v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1944

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Merrow v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Nelson v. Spalding CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  3. Joyce v. Van ArsdaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  4. Dewey v. KellerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Miree v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API