Millison v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

CLIFFORD, J.

We affirm, substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in its opinion reported at 226 N.J.Super. 572.

We add to the Appellate Division’s thorough analysis only the following observations. Defendants contend that defendant Dr. William L. Neeld, an employee of defendant du Pont, cannot properly be held liable because there is no evidence that Neeld reviewed the medical records of plaintiffs Millison and Agar and thereafter concealed knowledge of those plaintiffs’ asbestos-related diseases. In fact, the record contains…