Legal Opinion
Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 11, 1938No. Civ. No. 11803PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
This is a writ of review to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission.
Viewing the evidence most favorable to respondents, the essential facts are:
On October 11, 1937, respondent Emma Kendall was in the employ of Union Manufacturing Company as a seaming machine operator, being paid on a piece-work basis for her services. Prior thereto and in conformity with the provisions of subsection (a) of section 159 of the National Labor Relations Act, U. S. C. A., title 29 (labor), respondent Kendall had signed an instrument designating certain of her fellow employees as a “union committee”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Judson Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Matter of Daly v. . Bates RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Associated Oil Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Spatafore v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Department of Correction v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Tegels v. Kaiser-Frazer Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.