Legal Opinion

Hartman Realty Co. v. Local 150 United Mechanics

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 11, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Service upon the manager of the tenant was no compliance with sectionT3 of the General Associations Law. The court therefore acquired no jurisdiction over the tenant. An objection to the court’s jurisdiction may be taken by answer (Lloyd v. Sloan, 259 App. Div. 615).

Final order and judgment reversed, with twenty dollars costs, and final order directed in favor of tenant, dismissing the proceeding with costs, without prejudice to a new proceeding.

Hammer, Shten-tag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lloyd v. SloanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caines v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1957