Freeman v. State

RATLIFF, Chief Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

James E. Freeman appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief alleging that his guilty plea to a charge of driving while intoxicated was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently. We affirm.

FACTS

On March 25, 1983, Freeman pleaded guilty to the charge of operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. Prior to that, he signed a written form in which he waived all of his rights, indicated that he understood the nature of the charges against him, that he was aware of the possible range of sentences, and that he was signing the…