Legal Opinion

Stamm v. Stamm

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 5, 1986No. 85-1436PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding primary residential responsibility of a child.

In any child custody proceeding the prime consideration is the welfare of the child. Miraglia v. Miraglia, 462 So.2d 507 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Marshall v. Marshall, 375 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). *852All factors affecting the best interest and welfare of the child must be considered. Section 61.13(3), Florida Statutes (1985) lists ten factors which the trial court should consider in evaluating and determining the best interest of the child. It appears from the final judgment dissolving…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Canakaris v. CanakarisSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Dinkel v. DinkelSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. In Re GregorySupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  4. Bienvenu v. BienvenuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  5. Miraglia v. MiragliaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zepeda v. ZepedaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Mulligan v. MulliganCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API